Skip to main content

Family Office- Indian Scenario


What is a ‘Family Office’?

A Family Office or a Single Family Office (SFO) is a professional platform dedicated to investing financials of high and ultra high net worth individuals, with the objective to manage and protect the wealth of a family through private wealth management advisory outfits.

A Family Office allows the family to pursue its own customized wealth management approach and guarantees the highest degree of confidentiality, thereby giving such individuals greater control over their finances.

A Family Office provides solution for building, preserving and transferring family wealth and legacy. The concept of Family Office is limited to high and ultra high net worth individuals, as they have higher risk-taking capabilities.

Another common concept is Multi-Family Offices (MFO) which provides a variety of financial and non financial services including tax and estate planning, risk management, objective financial counsel, trusteeship, lifestyle management. As the customized services offered by a multi-family office can be costly, clients of a of a Multi Family Office have a net worth exceeding that of 50 million.

Family Office- A foreign concept?

The concept of having a Family Office is fairly common to UK, the US and Europe. The early Family Offices can be traced to Europe, created in the early 19th century by wealthy merchants along the eastern coast of the United States and more famously by the Rockefeller family. Faced with the increasingly intensive process of wealth management, advisors were hired with the time and expertise to protect family interests.

Indians too have started to inculcate the idea of establishing a Family Office as can be seen from Azim Premji's ‘PremjiInvest’, Ajit Khimji's ‘Khimji Family Office’, N R Narayana Murthy's ‘Catamaran Ventures’ and the Ambani Family.

However orthodox family businesses prefer to have a 'sethji' do a lot of backseat driving even if they hire professionals to manage their wealth.

Family Office vs. Banks

Several bankers often do approach high and ultra high net individuals but are unable to give a consolidated portfolio allocation. Advisors generally only talk about the products marketed by their institutions, and fail to understand the nuanced needs of a family business, as a result the financial advice doled out often does not suit the requirements of the family and is not productive in the long run. 

Practical Scenario

·         The country is home to 90 mammoth SFOs that manage private wealth in excess of $100 billion, according to an internal study conducted by Association of International Wealth Management of India (AIWMI).

·         Ashni Biyani, daughter of Future Group chief Kishore Biyani, is one next-gen scion who is setting up a family office to manage the family's personal wealth, amongst other objectives.

·        Ramesh Chauhan, owner of the Bisleri brand, is a rare first-generation promoter who has sought professional advice to manage his wealth — he has outsourced the task to DSP Merrill Lynch.

·   Capital pools such as Narayan Murthy's Catamaran Ventures is learnt to have (direct and indirect) investments in over 100 start-up ventures.

·         Azim Premji's Premji Invest has money parked in Flipkart, Myntra and Snapdeal.

·         Ajay Piramal's SFO is ploughing in as much as $50 million into Montane Venture, an early-stage fund, as its anchor investor.

·     Burman Family Holdings, the proprietary investment arm of the promoters of the Rs 53,000 crore retail conglomerate Dabur India, was said to be stitching together a syndicate that will identify and make growth stage investments across sectors.

Delhi-based Campus Activewear Pvt. Ltd has raised an undisclosed amount in funding from TPG Growth, the growth equity and mid-market buyout fund of private equity firm TPG Capital Inc, and QRG Enterprises Ltd, the family office of the promoters of Havells Group.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EXPULSION OF A MEMBER

The termination or cessation of a membership can be undertaken pursuant to section 41 of the Companies Act, 1956, whereby the member may be expelled from membership. 1.       Public Limited Company The concept of expulsion of a member of a company by the Board of Directors, pursuant to alteration of articles by special resolution [1] had been attended to by the erstwhile Department of Company Affairs (“ Department ”) vide Circular No. 32/75 [2] (“ Circular ”). The Department opined that [3] “ …….that amendment of articles of association of a company providing for expulsion of a member of the management is opposed to the fundamental principles of the company's jurisprudence and is ultra vires the company. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in this case [4] , even though pertaining to the refusal of a company to the admission of a person as a member of the company, are applicable even with greater force to a case of expulsion of an existing member. …

Express Industry Council of India Vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. & Others.

Nature of Case: Inquiry under section 19(1)(a) Competition Act, 2002 Case No. 30 of 2013 Brief Summary: The Competition Commission of India (“ CCI ”) imposed penalties totalling Rs 258 crores (INR 2.58 billion) on Jet Airways, IndiGo and SpiceJet for cartelisation in fixing fuel surcharge (“ FSC ”) for transporting cargo. The inquiry was initiated against 5 airlines namely Jet Airways, IndiGo Airlines, Spice Jet, Air India, and Go Air based on a complaint filed by Express Industry Council of India under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( “Act” ) in May 2009 against the FSC for transporting cargo by Airline companies. The principal issue was whether the Airlines had operated in a “concerted action” by overcharging for cargo freight. Though the enquiry conducted by the Director General (“ DG ”) found that the Airlines were not resorting to any collusion, the CCI rejected the DG’s findings and penalised three carriers, namely Jet Airways, InterGlob