Skip to main content

Rights of minority shareholders

Who are minority shareholders?

Any shareholder holding a nominal or minimal amount of shares, not sufficient to effect any change is a minority shareholder of a company.

As per the Companies Act, 2013, the provisions providing for the right of minority shareholders is as follows:-

1.      Right of shareholder of a private company to vote against entrenchment[1];
2.      Right of shareholder to object to amendment in prospectus; right to be given option to exit and exit price as determined by SEBI[2];
3.      Right to object to changes in shareholder rights, and apply to the Tribunal for the cancellation of such variation[3];
4.      Right to freely transfer shares[4];
5.      Right of shareholder to be given notice for any resolution requiring special notice[5];
6.      Right of shareholder to appoint a director in a listed company[6];
7.      Right to object to a compromise or arrangement made with members or creditors;[7]
8.      Right of minority shareholder to be notified of the intention of majority shareholders to acquire remaining equity shares[8];
9.      Right of minority shareholders to offer minority shareholding in company to majority at a price as determined by the valuer[9];
10.  Right of minority to receive payment and delivery of shares through the transferor company, acting as a transfer agent[10]
11.  Right to receive on pro-rata basis , additional compensation received by majority shareholders on transfer of shareholding, by negotiating a higher price[11]
12.  Right of residual minority equity shareholders to continue under section 236, even on failure of majority shareholders to purchase minority shareholding[12];
13.  Right to make an application to the tribunal in cases of oppression and mismanagement [13]; complaints may relate to:-
1.      Affairs of company conducted in a manner prejudicial to his or another’s interest;
2.      Material change in the company, not in the interest of shareholder
14.  Right to file class action suits in when affairs of the company are being conducted in a prejudicial manner[14]; the suit seeks an order against the company, and can relate to the following:
1.      To restrain the company from committing an act which is ultra vires[15];
2.      To restrain the company from committing breach of any provision of MoA[16];
3.      To declare a resolution altering the memorandum or articles of the company as void if the resolution was passed by suppression of material facts or obtained by mis-statement to the members[17];
4.      To restrain the company from doing an act contrary to the provisions of the Act[18];
5.      To restrain the company from taking action contrary to any resolution passed by the members[19];
6.      To claim damages or compensation or demand any other suitable action[20] from directors, auditors ,any experts, partners;
10.       During the preparation of consolidated financial statements, profit or loss attributable to   “minority interest” and to owners of the parent in the statement of profit and loss shall be        presented as allocation for the period. Right of the “minority interests” within equity shall be presented separately from the equity of the owners of the parent  in the balance sheet[21];
11.       Right to have interest safeguarded by the independent director[22];

S.No
Section
Provision relating to
Notified
1.       
27 (2);
115;
151;

MINORITY PROTECTION
YES
2.       
48(2);
235;
236;
MINORITY PROTECTION
NO
3.       
58(2)

ENFORCEABILITY OF RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFERABILITY

YES
4.       
5(3)
ENTRENCHMENT
YES
5.       
Proviso to S.230(4)

RAISE AN OBJECTION TO A COMPROMISE OR ARRANGEMENT

NO




[1] 5(4):Articles
[2] 27(2): Prospectus
[3] 48(2): Variation of shareholders rights
[4] 58(2): Refusal of Registration and appeal against refusal
[5] 115: Resolutions Requiring special notice.
[6] 151: Appointment of director elected by small shareholders
[7] 230(4) Proviso
[8] 236(1): Purchase of minority shareholding
[9] 236(2): Purchase of minority shareholding
[10] 236(5): Purchase of minority shareholding
[11] 236(8) Purchase of minority shareholding
[12] 236(9) Purchase of minority shareholding
[13] 241: Application to Tribunal for relief in cases of oppression, etc.
[14] 245: class action
[15] 245(1)(a)
[16] 245(1)(b)
[17] 245(1)(c)
[18] 245(1)(d)
[19] 245(1)(e)
[20] 245(1)(f)
[21] General Instructions For The Preparation Of Consolidated Financial Statements
[22] CODE FOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EXPULSION OF A MEMBER

The termination or cessation of a membership can be undertaken pursuant to section 41 of the Companies Act, 1956, whereby the member may be expelled from membership. 1.       Public Limited Company The concept of expulsion of a member of a company by the Board of Directors, pursuant to alteration of articles by special resolution [1] had been attended to by the erstwhile Department of Company Affairs (“ Department ”) vide Circular No. 32/75 [2] (“ Circular ”). The Department opined that [3] “ …….that amendment of articles of association of a company providing for expulsion of a member of the management is opposed to the fundamental principles of the company's jurisprudence and is ultra vires the company. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in this case [4] , even though pertaining to the refusal of a company to the admission of a person as a member of the company, are applicable even with greater force to a case of expulsion of a...

Express Industry Council of India Vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. & Others.

Nature of Case: Inquiry under section 19(1)(a) Competition Act, 2002 Case No. 30 of 2013 Brief Summary: The Competition Commission of India (“ CCI ”) imposed penalties totalling Rs 258 crores (INR 2.58 billion) on Jet Airways, IndiGo and SpiceJet for cartelisation in fixing fuel surcharge (“ FSC ”) for transporting cargo. The inquiry was initiated against 5 airlines namely Jet Airways, IndiGo Airlines, Spice Jet, Air India, and Go Air based on a complaint filed by Express Industry Council of India under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( “Act” ) in May 2009 against the FSC for transporting cargo by Airline companies. The principal issue was whether the Airlines had operated in a “concerted action” by overcharging for cargo freight. Though the enquiry conducted by the Director General (“ DG ”) found that the Airlines were not resorting to any collusion, the CCI rejected the DG’s findings and penalised three carriers, namely Jet Airways, InterGlob...

Family Office- Indian Scenario

What is a ‘Family Office’? A Family Office or a Single Family Office (SFO) is a professional platform dedicated to investing financials of high and ultra high net worth individuals, with the objective to manage and protect the wealth of a family through private wealth management advisory outfits. A Family Office allows the family to pursue its own customized wealth management approach and guarantees the highest degree of confidentiality, thereby giving such individuals greater control over their finances. A Family Office provides solution for building, preserving and transferring family wealth and legacy. The concept of Family Office is limited to high and ultra high net worth individuals, as they have higher risk-taking capabilities. Another common concept is Multi-Family Offices (MFO) which provides a variety of financial and non financial services including tax and estate planning, risk management, objective financial counsel, trusteeship, lifestyle management. As...