Skip to main content

Business And Asset Transfer in India


Business Transfer:

Process whereby an entire business undertaking is sold is known as slump sale. Another way to sell the business is through an itemised sale wherein, gain or loss on sale of such assets is computed based on whether the asset is depreciable or not and on the basis of the period of its holding. In a slump sale no individual asset or liability is given a value, as it is sold in lump-sum. It is executed through a Business Transfer Agreement. In such a transfer the earlier undertaking virtually ceases to exist.  

Asset Transfer:

Process whereby the assets of an undertaking are sold in one or over multiple agreements, each being taxable. It is executed through am Asset Transfer Agreement.


S.N
Points of Diffrence
Business Transfer
Asset Transfer
1.       
Applicable Sales Tax
Not applicable
Applicable
2.       

Capital Gain
Calculated as per section 50B of the IT Act.
Calculated as per section 48 and/or 50, depending upon the nature and type of transaction
3.       
Execution
Through a Business Transfer Agreement
Through an Asset Transfer Agreement
4.       
Ownership
There is a complete change in the ownership of the business
Change in the ownership of asset from the purchaser to the purchase
5.       
Dissolution
The Business is dissolved
No dissolution of the business takes place
6.       
Automatic transfer
Involves the sale and purchase of assets as part of the business transfer
There is no transfer of the business as a whole, only of assets
7.       
Transfer of liabilities
Involves the transfer of liabilities as well
No liabilities pass on to the purchaser
8.       
Due diligence
More expensive due diligence due  to the vast nature of transaction
Comparatively cheaper due diligence due to limited scope of transaction
9.       
Retention of goodwill
Only the retention of goodwill takes place
No transfer/retention of goodwill takes place
10.   
Transfer of employees
Automatic transfer of employees
No such transfer undertaken

Important case laws:

The court held in the below given cases that Sales Tax is not applicable on transactions involving lump sale, as the business undertaken is not in the nature of ordinary course of business and that the sale of business cannot be covered under the head of sale of goods.

1.      Sri Ram Sahai vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax [1]
2.      Monsanto Chemicals Of India (P.) Limited V. The State of Tamil Nadu[2]
3.      Coromondal Fertilizers Limited vs. State of AP and Spectra Bottling Co. v. State of AP,[3]

In Mahindra Engineering & Chemical Products Limited v ITO 2(2)(2)[4]. The Tribunal held that in the commercial world, transactions would have to be considered in totality and that the substance of the transaction was relevant rather than its form. The transaction was held to be sale of business and taxes accordingly.

In PNB finance ltd. V. Cit[5], the SC after considering sections 41(2), and 45, held that gain from slump transactions is neither taxable as business income u/s. 41 (2) nor as capital gains u/s. 45 of the act. To attract section 41 (2), the subject matter should be depreciable assets and the consideration received should be capable of allocation between various assets. In case of a slump sale, there is an undertaking which gets transferred (including depreciable and non-depreciable assets) and it is not possible to allocate slump price to depreciable assets and therefore, the same cannot be taxed u/s. 41 (2). To attract capital gain, held that the charging section and the computation sections are integrated code and if one fails other fails. If the computation sections fail then even the charging section fails.

Calculation of capital gains for Business Transfer:

Full consideration of sale
Less: Net Worth of the business so sold from the full value of sale consideration.

Capital gain on sale of a business which is more than 36 months old is regarded as a long term capital gain regardless of the period for which individual assets forming part of the business have been held.

Calculation of capital gains for Asset Transfer:

Short-term capital assets[Section 48]
Full value of consideration
Less: Cost of acquisition of asset
Less: Cost of improvement
Less: Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such transfer

Long-term capital assets[Section 48]
Full value of consideration
Less: Indexed Cost of acquisition (See Note 1)
Less: Indexed Cost of Improvement (See Note 1)
Less: Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such transfer

Depreciable asset[Section 50]
WDV of block of asset at the beginning of previous year
Add: Actual cost of assets falling within that block acquired during the year
Less: Full value of consideration of assets transferred during the year
Less: Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with such transfer



[1] (1963) 14 STC 275 (All)
[2] (1982) 51 STC 278 (Mad)
[3] (1999) 112 STC 1 AP
[4] (ITA No 2544 / Mum / 2010 dated April 18, 2012)
[5] (175 taxman 242)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EXPULSION OF A MEMBER

The termination or cessation of a membership can be undertaken pursuant to section 41 of the Companies Act, 1956, whereby the member may be expelled from membership. 1.       Public Limited Company The concept of expulsion of a member of a company by the Board of Directors, pursuant to alteration of articles by special resolution [1] had been attended to by the erstwhile Department of Company Affairs (“ Department ”) vide Circular No. 32/75 [2] (“ Circular ”). The Department opined that [3] “ …….that amendment of articles of association of a company providing for expulsion of a member of the management is opposed to the fundamental principles of the company's jurisprudence and is ultra vires the company. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in this case [4] , even though pertaining to the refusal of a company to the admission of a person as a member of the company, are applicable even with greater force to a case of expulsion of an existing member. …

Express Industry Council of India Vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. & Others.

Nature of Case: Inquiry under section 19(1)(a) Competition Act, 2002 Case No. 30 of 2013 Brief Summary: The Competition Commission of India (“ CCI ”) imposed penalties totalling Rs 258 crores (INR 2.58 billion) on Jet Airways, IndiGo and SpiceJet for cartelisation in fixing fuel surcharge (“ FSC ”) for transporting cargo. The inquiry was initiated against 5 airlines namely Jet Airways, IndiGo Airlines, Spice Jet, Air India, and Go Air based on a complaint filed by Express Industry Council of India under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( “Act” ) in May 2009 against the FSC for transporting cargo by Airline companies. The principal issue was whether the Airlines had operated in a “concerted action” by overcharging for cargo freight. Though the enquiry conducted by the Director General (“ DG ”) found that the Airlines were not resorting to any collusion, the CCI rejected the DG’s findings and penalised three carriers, namely Jet Airways, InterGlob

Family Office- Indian Scenario

What is a ‘Family Office’? A Family Office or a Single Family Office (SFO) is a professional platform dedicated to investing financials of high and ultra high net worth individuals, with the objective to manage and protect the wealth of a family through private wealth management advisory outfits. A Family Office allows the family to pursue its own customized wealth management approach and guarantees the highest degree of confidentiality, thereby giving such individuals greater control over their finances. A Family Office provides solution for building, preserving and transferring family wealth and legacy. The concept of Family Office is limited to high and ultra high net worth individuals, as they have higher risk-taking capabilities. Another common concept is Multi-Family Offices (MFO) which provides a variety of financial and non financial services including tax and estate planning, risk management, objective financial counsel, trusteeship, lifestyle management. As