Skip to main content

Note on Reliance Cement Ltd.

RELIANCE CEMENT[1]:
·         NAME: Reliance Cement Company Private Limited
·         INCORPORATED IN[2]: 24/08/2007
·         REGISTERED OFFICE:
o   H, Block, 1st Floor,
Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City, 
Navi Mumbai,
400 710,
Maharashtra, India
www.reliancecement.com
·         REGISTRATION NO. : 173458
·         TYPE: Private unlisted company being a wholly owned subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure Limited
·         NATURE: Company Limited by shares
·         DIRECTORS:
o   ATUL RASIKLAL DESAI: Whole-time Director
o   DARSHAN LAL: Whole-time Director
·         SHAREHOLDING:
o   Reliance Infrastructure Limited holds 120996076 shares
o   Ms. Prachi Potnis holds 100 shares
·         RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED: Public listed company, a constituent of Reliance Group.
·         TOTAL PLANT SIZE: Total installed capacity of 5.8 Million Tonne Per Annum (MTPA)
·         PLANTS:
o   2.8 MTPA Integrated cement plant at Maihar, Madhya Pradesh,
o   2.2 MTPA grinding unit at Kundanganj (near Lucknow), Uttar Pradesh,
o   0.5 MTPA grinding unit at Butibori (near Nagpur), Maharashtra.
o   Marketing arrangement with at Durgapur, West Bengal with annual capacity of 0.3 Million Tonne.
·         FUTURE PLAN: Increasing its cement production capacity from existing 5.8 MTPA to 15 MTPA in next three years and build new cement plants in Yavatmal, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh
·         CURRENT DEVELOPMENT: 5 MTPA Greenfield project at Wani, in Maharashtra
·         POSITIONING: Reliance Cement is available in Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Jharkhand and select cities of Maharashtra





[1] Official reliance cement website, http://www.reliancecement.com/HTML/Know_About_Reliance_Cement.html, last visited 20/02/15
[2] Officia MCAwebsite,
http://www.mca.gov.in/DCAPortalWeb/dca/CompanyMaster.do , last visited 21/02/15

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EXPULSION OF A MEMBER

The termination or cessation of a membership can be undertaken pursuant to section 41 of the Companies Act, 1956, whereby the member may be expelled from membership. 1.       Public Limited Company The concept of expulsion of a member of a company by the Board of Directors, pursuant to alteration of articles by special resolution [1] had been attended to by the erstwhile Department of Company Affairs (“ Department ”) vide Circular No. 32/75 [2] (“ Circular ”). The Department opined that [3] “ …….that amendment of articles of association of a company providing for expulsion of a member of the management is opposed to the fundamental principles of the company's jurisprudence and is ultra vires the company. The principles laid down by the Supreme Court in this case [4] , even though pertaining to the refusal of a company to the admission of a person as a member of the company, are applicable even with greater force to a case of expulsion of a...
6 comments
Read more

Express Industry Council of India Vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. & Others.

Nature of Case: Inquiry under section 19(1)(a) Competition Act, 2002 Case No. 30 of 2013 Brief Summary: The Competition Commission of India (“ CCI ”) imposed penalties totalling Rs 258 crores (INR 2.58 billion) on Jet Airways, IndiGo and SpiceJet for cartelisation in fixing fuel surcharge (“ FSC ”) for transporting cargo. The inquiry was initiated against 5 airlines namely Jet Airways, IndiGo Airlines, Spice Jet, Air India, and Go Air based on a complaint filed by Express Industry Council of India under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( “Act” ) in May 2009 against the FSC for transporting cargo by Airline companies. The principal issue was whether the Airlines had operated in a “concerted action” by overcharging for cargo freight. Though the enquiry conducted by the Director General (“ DG ”) found that the Airlines were not resorting to any collusion, the CCI rejected the DG’s findings and penalised three carriers, namely Jet Airways, InterGlob...
6 comments
Read more

NON-COMPETE AND NON-SOLICIT CLAUSES

Non-Compete clause bars employees from competing with the business of the former employer during the term of the employment, as well as post termination of the employment agreement. The non-compete clause is a relatively common to employment agreements with key employees, directors and promoters.  Non-Solicitation clause prohibits the employees from persuading the former employer’s customers, workforce, third parties like agents or suppliers etc from terminating their relationship with the employer and join the former employee.  Below are the frequently asked question on non compete and non solicit clauses and their impact on employee agreements in India. 1. Whether a non-compete clause is enforceable against an employee in India as a matter of law.  1.1 Pursuant to the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the law governing commercial agreements and transactions, agreements wherein any restraint or limitation is imposed, which restricts either...
Post a Comment
Read more